At some point your beloved elderly relative names you as attorney in fact in her durable power of attorney. You graciously accept the role and help her paying her bills and otherwise managing the house as her time on earth grows long.
Months, perhaps years later as your elderly relative lays dying she hands you her antique vase and declares “I want you to have this”. You accept graciously. Later you leave taking the vase with you.
Upon awakening the next day you find she has expired during the night. First there is the shock, then the funeral arrangements, and finally the probate gets underway. Everyone wants to know where the antique vase has gone. You tell the rest of the family our dear departed has given this to you.
The families response: PROVE IT.
The law in Washington is on the side of the family. The question is whether undue influence exists. For a will, contestants must show that undue influence lead to the execution of the will. For those who have done the labor of being attorney in fact who now find themselves defending a deathbed gift, the person receiving the gift must prove he did not practice undue influence by clear cogent and convincing evidence, far more than a preponderance. Good luck. He had a “confidential relationship” which essentially presumes people in this role take advantage of the elderly.
Plan on returning the vase and save the attorney fees. It is curious at least that while we allow and encourage persons to transfer authority to manage affairs to someone they trust, rather than allowing an expensive guardianship to accrue, we presume they are acting with avarice if something as simple as a human act of gratitude is practiced as a last act in a life.