Among the Do It Yourself Will carnage we see after people pass on are amendments made by themselves on the face of their documents after seeing the lawyer and then apparently changing their mind.
Reviewing a will that comes into the office all marked up we have to first decide who made the changes; the testator or someone finding the will and unhappy with his decisions while he was alive. Assuming the former, I was astonished to find a statute here in Washington State that sets out the rules for a do it yourself change to your will.
Forever we have had the rule that one must have a testator signing his will in the presence of two witnesses that sign it as well. That has not changed.
It seems however to be that one can revoke any particular gift by drawing a line through it, this is without two witnesses. You may not however add terms without those witnesses.
But then there is some case law that says if the deletion materially alters the disposition of the will in an unnatural manner, the partial revocation is void. So for example deleting a distant relative of a small gift might be OK, striking out two of three children without a formal disinheritance through Wills Act formality would not.
Think of the opportunities for fraud or other mischief, leaving it to the lawyers to unravel. The attorney fees involved are exponentially higher than merely returning to the lawyer for a codicil, usually a modest effort.
This would probably make good television. I hope am played by George Clooney.